From the Pinpitch output gallery

See the actual research + drafts we produce.

Three curated anonymized examples — judge the output before you sign up.

What you'll actually get

Three real outputs. All companies and people anonymized.

Each card below shows the same Pinpitch run a paying user would see — research dossier on the left, talking points in the middle, ready-to-edit cold email on the right. The names, companies, and emails below are placeholders.

Research dossier SaaS / Dev tools COMPANY INTEL
Searched for
VP of Growth · [Company A] · developer observability
  • [Company A] is a Series B developer-observability platform with roughly 120 employees. Their product helps engineering teams trace and debug distributed services across Kubernetes, with strong positioning around OpenTelemetry-native instrumentation.
  • Public engineering blog posts in the last quarter have stressed cost-of-storage headaches at high-cardinality — they explicitly published a case study showing a 4× reduction in trace-storage cost after adopting their tiered-storage feature.
  • They recently hired a VP of Growth from a competing APM vendor (per a public LinkedIn post); their Q3 push is reported to be expanding upmarket from mid-market to enterprise accounts.
  • A senior engineer at [Company A] wrote about struggles instrumenting gRPC services at scale on their blog — a known pain point for teams running polyglot microservices.
  • The published cost-of-storage pain signal means any tool that compresses or summarises trace data sits squarely on their radar right now.
  • Their upmarket move suggests inbound demo demand is exceeding self-serve capacity — outbound tooling that books demos, not just opens replies, would map to where they're headed.
  • They've been hiring growth folks from competitor APM shops — their ICP for tools overlaps ours.
To: recipient@example-company.com · Subject: The gRPC instrumentation post caught my eye
Hi [First Name], Saw [Company A]'s recent engineering post on instrumenting gRPC services at scale — the section on context propagation across polyglot runtimes mirrors what we hear from teams evaluating our trace-summarisation tool. We helped a comparable Series B observability team cut trace-storage cost 38% in six weeks without losing the top-decile traces their SREs rely on. Not a magic product — a small set of pipeline tricks plus a tighter schema. Worth a 20-minute look next week? I'd bring the before/after trace volumes and you can decide if it's worth a real pilot. — Jordan
11 sources · compiled in 52 seconds Disputes flagged: 0
Research dossier Healthcare COMPANY INTEL
Searched for
Head of Operations · [Company B] · regional hospital network
  • [Company B] is a regional non-profit hospital network with 14 acute-care sites across three states. Public 990 filings show operating revenue north of $1.4B and a roughly 8% operating margin band typical for mid-size regionals.
  • Their annual community-benefit report highlights workforce shortages in radiology and nursing, with a stated goal of reducing contract-labor spend by 25% over two years (their explicit dollar target).
  • Earlier this year they rolled out a unified EHR-adjacent scheduling system across six of their facilities, with the remaining eight scheduled for the next fiscal year — a known operational pain point during phased rollouts.
  • A regional news piece quoted their COO noting readmission rates for cardiac patients sat 1.4 points above the national median for the third year in a row, and that post-discharge follow-up was the named intervention.
  • The phased EHR rollout will create a two-tier operations reality for at least the next 12 months — any tool that bridges both cleanly is timely.
  • The contract-labor cost goal is a named KPI in their public filings, which means it's something the COO is measured on and motivated to fix.
  • Cardiac post-discharge follow-up is a research-validated wedge — and their public readmission numbers back up the pain.
To: recipient@example-company.com · Subject: Post-EHR-rollout scheduling — what we learned at a similar network
Hi [First Name], Congrats on pushing the unified scheduling rollout to six sites — having watched two regional hospital networks do phased rollouts, the gap between "live" and "operating as designed" tends to be 4–6 months of cross-site friction, not 4–6 weeks. We work with regional networks that size to bridge that gap: shared standing-order templates, consistent discharge-checklist orchestration across the live and pending sites, and a small workflow-engine that pulls the readmission-rate-trend work your COO flagged in the regional piece closer to peers. Would a 20-minute call next week be worth it? If the rollout timing is already past the point where we can help, I'd still rather know than guess. — Priya
9 sources · compiled in 61 seconds Disputes flagged: 0
Research dossier Fintech COMPANY INTEL
Searched for
Director of Partnerships · [Company C] · B2B payments
  • [Company C] is a B2B payments platform focused on cross-border payouts to contractors and vendors. Recent press coverage described a base of roughly 6,000 active business customers and a recent expansion into LATAM corridors.
  • Their risk team published a blog series on sanctions-screening false positives in cross-border wires — a documented industry pain point that costs ops teams headcount.
  • Two industry podcasts in the past six weeks have referenced [Company C] actively recruiting embedded-finance ISVs as distribution partners, with named interest in vertical SaaS platforms handling payroll and AP use cases.
  • Their engineering job board lists several open roles for KYC and onboarding automation — a strong signal that reducing manual review is a current quarter priority.
  • The sanctions-screening false-positive rate is a published, quantified pain — they're sounding the alarm on it publicly, which often precedes a tooling RFP.
  • The ISV partnership push is recruitment-mode, not just marketing — outreach tools that book meetings with named verticals would map cleanly.
  • The new KYC automation hiring is a forward indicator they're building internal tooling rather than buying — worth a calibrated "we already solve this" angle.
To: recipient@example-company.com · Subject: Sanctions screening — a 0.7% false-positive reduction we shipped at a similar cross-border payouts shop
Hi [First Name], Read [Company C]'s series on cross-border sanctions-screening false positives — the graph showing the false-positive rate spiking on LATAM corridors exactly mirrored what we saw at a similar-sized payouts platform last quarter. We shipped a small targeted layer that took their manual-review queue from ~22% of wires down to ~7%, mostly by reweighting name-match heuristics against corridor-specific rules. Not a large platform play — a focused, narrow fix that took about five weeks to land. Worth 20 minutes next week? If your team is mid-build on this internally I'd actually rather know now and compare notes. — Marcus
10 sources · compiled in 49 seconds Disputes flagged: 0

Ready to run your own?

Sign up free. One real research run on a real prospect. No credit card.

See pricing — research unlimited prospects on Pro → Try it free — pinpitchapp.com →

1 free search · Sources attached to every claim · Edit before you send